Education

At the time of this review, several standard fundamental metrics for DN1, including P/E ratio, earnings per share, revenue, net profit, price-to-free-cash-flow ratio and freeCash Flowyield, were reported as unavailable, which is not uncommon for listed investment trusts whose structure differs from operating companies …

The fund's asset allocation was reported entirely in bonds at 100.00%, with no cash orEquityexposure recorded. AEBD held a broad base of 282 companies, a considerably larger number than several comparable funds, with the top 10 holdings accounting for just 13.48% of the portfolio.

ALTB's asset allocation showed 99.98% in bonds and a marginal 0.02% in cash. The fund held only 18 companies, the second-smallest count among the funds reviewed, with the top 10 holdings representing 96.72% of the portfolio.

The management fee was reported at 1.38% per annum, notably higher than the bond ETFs covered elsewhere in this review, reflecting the cost structure associated with a geared currency exposure.

BILL's asset allocation was reported entirely in cash at 100.00%, consistent with its mandate to invest in highly liquid securities such as bank deposits and bank bills with an overallMaturityexpected to be less than one year. The fund held 77 companies, with the top …

The management fee was reported at 0.42% per annum, reflecting the additional cost typically associated with active strategies.

The portfolio's concentration is notable: 100% ofAssetssit in bonds, with no cash,Equityor other asset classes reported. Thirteen companies made up the total holdings, and the top 10 alone represented 82.59% of the fund, leaving only 17.40% spread across remaining positions.