Rachel Reeves is considering overruling the Supreme Court if judges side with consumers over the £44bn car finance scandal. Under plans being considered by the Chancellor, the Government could retrospectively alter the law to reduce the liabilities paid by lenders if the Supreme Court upholds a decision made by the Court of Appeal last October. Britain’s biggest banks could be forced to pay out £44bn in compensation to drivers after customers said they were unlawfully sold car loans. The Treasury is debating if new laws could be applied retrospectively to the case, allowing them to cover old contracts and cases, The Guardian reported. Such a move would cut the multibillion-pound bill facing lenders including Close Brothers, Barclays, Santander and Lloyds. Retrospective legislation would also ensure the scandal does not balloon beyond car loans, and potentially expose lenders to complaints over commission payments across other financial products such as loans for household appliances and furniture. Government sources refused to rule out such an intervention from Ms Reeves. The Supreme Court is due to announce its long-awaited ruling on Friday Aug 1. It comes after the Supreme Court in February stopped an attempt by the Chancellor to block payouts to drivers. The Treasury argued the scandal threatened to undermine the UK economy and deter investment, saying payouts must be limited. The regulations which govern these payments come under common law. Therefore, they are set by judges using court decisions, rather than by Parliament. New legislation would allow Parliament to have the final say on the handling and disclosure of commission arrangements handed to borrowers. Although passing retrospective legislation on compensation in the UK is uncommon and controversial, it is not unprecedented. In 2013, the Parliament passed the Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Act, to prevent £130m in compensation payments being made to people who had their benefits stopped following their refusal to work for private companies. Several lenders have set aside significant sums to cover potential compensation costs, including Lloyds Banking Group, which has reserved £1.2bn, Santander UK is designating £295m to cover the costs in compensation and Close Brothers has put aside £165m. The Treasury was contacted for comment. View Comments
Reeves could overrule Supreme Court in £44bn car finance scandal
You are reading a free article with opinions that may differ from the recommendation given by Kalkine in its paid research reports. Become a Kalkine member today to get access to our research reports, in-depth technical and fundamental research.
Start Your Free Trial Now!Not sure where to invest today?
Kalkine’s latest research highlights three companies identified through in-depth analysis and market insights.
Explore these research reports to learn about companies currently being tracked by our analysts and make more informed investment decisions.
View 3 Research ReportsThis information, including any data, is sourced from Unicorn Data Services SAS, trading as EOD Historical Data (“EODHD”) on ‘as is’ basis, using their API. The information and data provided on this page, as well as via the API, are not guaranteed to be real-time or accurate. In some cases, the data may include analyst ratings or recommendations sourced through the EODHD API, which are intended solely for general informational purposes.
This information does not consider your personal objectives, financial situation, or needs. Kalkine does not assume any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this information, data, or any analyst rating or recommendation provided. Kalkine will not accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the information, including but not limited to data, quotes, charts, analyst ratings, recommendations, and buy/sell signals sourced via the API.
Please be fully informed about the risks and costs associated with trading in the financial markets, as it is one of the riskiest forms of investment. Kalkine does not provide any warranties regarding the information on this page, including, without limitation, warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use.
Please wait processing your request...