Key Highlights
- Housing prices have declined by more than the RBA expected since its previous assessment.
- Prices have fallen further from their March peak.
- Business lending is the main cross-current, with Credit growth remaining encouraging.
- The housing weakness sits within financial conditions the RBA judges to be restrictive.
Three words in the Reserve Bank's November Statement – "more than expected" – mark housing as one of the areas where the economy has moved faster than the Central Bank anticipated.
Central bank documents are written with care, and phrases such as "more than expected" are not used lightly. In its November 2026 Statement on Monetary Policy (SMP), the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) applied that phrase to housing. The financial conditions chapter notes that "housing prices have declined by more than expected", while the economic conditions chapter says "Housing prices have declined further from their peak in March". Together, the two lines describe a property market that has weakened for several months and by a Margin the RBA had not built into its earlier view.
Reading the wording
"More than expected" is a comparison with the RBA's own previous assessment, most naturally the August SMP and the forecasting work behind it. Any precise figure for the size of the slide would need to come from the underlying data rather than from these statements.
The second line adds timing. Prices peaked in March and have "declined further" since – so this is not a single soft month but a decline extending over a number of months.
The word "further" also matters. It indicates the slide had already been noted and has continued, rather than being a fresh development.
Where housing fits in the bigger picture
The SMP folds housing into its broader judgement that financial conditions are "judged to be restrictive, but with various cross-currents". Falling prices are consistent with restrictive conditions: higher borrowing costs reduce how much buyers can borrow and can dampen demand.
Several other features of the financial landscape sit alongside the housing slide:
- On 3 November the Monetary Policy Board lifted the cash rate target by 25 basis points to 4.85 per cent, from 4.60 per cent, saying "the Board judged that a further tightening in financial conditions is warranted".
- "Australian government bond yields have also increased since the August Statement", sitting "around their highest levels in many years".
- "the nominal Exchange Rate has appreciated since the start of the year".
The cross-current is Business lending. The same chapter observes that business credit growth remains very encouraging. In other words, the tightening has shown up clearly in housing but less so in firms' appetite for finance.
On the wider economy, the SMP says GDP growth "has slowed this year to a little below its potential growth rate".
Why a weaker housing market does not change the Inflation focus
It might seem that unexpectedly weak housing would argue against raising rates. The Board nonetheless tightened in November, and its reasoning centred on inflation.
The overview reports that "Headline inflation was 3.9 per cent over the year to the September quarter and trimmed mean inflation was 3.7 per cent." The monthly CPI indicator showed headline inflation of 4.3 per cent in the September month. The RBA now forecasts that "Headline inflation is expected to peak at 4.5 per cent in the December 2026 quarter", and that "Headline and trimmed mean inflation are now expected to remain above 3 per cent until end-2027".
Governor Michele Bullock framed the decision as a trade-off: "Some pain now will prevent even worse pain down the track." She also stressed the risk of inflation becoming entrenched: "It is critical that we stop expectations for high inflation from becoming embedded in price-setting decisions".
From that perspective, softer housing is part of how restrictive policy works rather than a reason in itself to stop. The vote was not unanimous, however: six members supported the increase and three preferred to leave the cash rate at 4.60 per cent. The minutes, due on 17 November, may shed light on how much weight members placed on developments such as housing.
What falling prices mean for borrowers
The October 2026 Financial Stability Review (FSR) considered how households were coping with declining prices. Its assessment was that "Most borrowers appear well placed to manage ongoing cost pressures amid declining housing prices."
Two figures support that view. First, "less than 1 per cent of borrowers" were estimated to be in negative equity, owing more than their home is worth. Second, the share of variable-rate owner-occupier borrowers with a cash-flow shortfall "increased a little over the first half of 2026, but remains relatively low at around 2 per cent." The median borrower could cover "over a year of scheduled Mortgage payments at current interest rates" from buffers.
Those estimates were published on 1 October, before the November rate rise and before the SMP's latest description of the price decline. The next FSR, due on 25 March 2027, will reflect a longer period of falling prices.
Actual rates and pass-through vary between lenders.
The bottom line
The RBA's November wording places housing among the surprises of 2026: prices have fallen further since their March peak and by more than the central bank expected. That weakness sits within financial conditions the RBA judges to be restrictive, offset in part by very encouraging business credit growth. The Board has treated it as part of the cost of bringing inflation down rather than a reason to hold, while the FSR suggests most borrowers had the buffers to manage as at October. Whether the slide deepens or steadies will be one of the threads to follow through the November minutes, the October CPI on 25 November and the 8 December decision.






Please wait processing your request...