The sole purpose test
Every SMSF must be maintained for the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits to members, or death benefits to their dependants. The ATO gives a direct example: an SMSF that invests in a rental property specifically so a related party can live in it breaches the sole purpose test.
The test looks at how the fund is actually maintained, not just what the paperwork says. Even a genuine Investment can breach it if the surrounding arrangement delivers a current benefit to a member or relative.
Related parties cannot live in fund-owned residential property
Related parties are defined broadly and include fund members, their relatives, and Business partners and their associates. Residential property owned by an SMSF cannot be lived in by any of these people, and it cannot be rented to them either, whether or not they pay market rent.
The ban applies regardless of how the arrangement is described. Calling it a commercial lease, charging market rent, or having the relative sign a formal tenancy agreement does not change the outcome, because the property is residential and the occupant is a related party.
The in-house asset rules reinforce the ban
Leasing a fund asset to a related party generally makes it an in-house asset, and in-house Assets are capped at 5 per cent of the fund's total assets. For residential property leased to a relative, the arrangement is not permitted at all, so it cannot fit within even the 5 per cent allowance.
These rules work alongside the sole purpose test to close off indirect routes to the same outcome, including through a related trust or company.
Business real property is different
An exception exists for business real property, meaning premises used wholly and exclusively in a business. An SMSF can generally own business real property and Lease it to a related party, including a member's own business, provided the lease is on genuine commercial, arm's length terms and properly documented.
The lease should be in writing, set a market rent, and be honoured in practice, with rent actually paid on time, for the exception to apply.
Restrictions on acquiring property from related parties
Related-party rules also limit what the fund can acquire. An SMSF generally cannot acquire a residential property from a member or related party at all, even at market value.
Consider a hypothetical example. A member wants to transfer an investment unit they already own into their SMSF and rent it to their nephew. This fails on two fronts: the fund cannot acquire residential property from a related party, and it cannot rent residential property to a relative.






Please wait processing your request...